Tuesday, April 22, 2008

Love in the mirror


It's been long time since the last time I saw this photo of him. This morning, accidentally I fell on it, and my first reaction was; "Oh! How could I love that person some day?!. He's got the smallest mind, craziest self-centered character, and the last control on his own life!". I could see that obviously in the photo!, and it took me one look to figure it all out. Years ago, I was watching a movie based on an old novel I don't remember its title, and the actress's husband was traveling away for a long period. Meanwhile she fell in love with some one else. When she was meeting her coming back husband at the railway station, and on her first sight of him, she gasped; "Oh! What a big nose he's got!". Apparently the author didn't want to show us the big nose of the husband, he just wanted to highlight the eyes of the wife.

One of the greatest and craziest things about "love" is its "blind mirror", as we call it in Arabic. The woman in the movie/novel lived with her husband for years. It took her a long travel, and a new love, to see his big nose!. The great about it is how it makes us believe in love like nothing else, how we call ourselves "finally in love", and feel like owning the world with our significant other. The crazy about it is how we become so sure of love, that we get ready to sacrifice anything not to lose it, and it takes us a smaller thing than we imagine, to give up, a simple turn around!.



The "blind mirror of love" makes us living in marvelous heaven and forget what's going on down earth!. It makes us "fly" and "float" and everything beautiful, and forget the necessary existence of any thing bad. I believe it's like an equation. X is usually greater than Y. "What we have" is usually greater than "what we miss". "The heaven" is usually greater than "the hell". At a point, the equation goes in the opposite direction, when Y becomes greater than X. When "the hell" is too hot to bear, and "what we miss" is too much to live without. That's usually the point at which everything should stop, usually and not often, depending on the degree of "blindness".

"Greater than" (>) isn't so different in shape from "less than" (<). It has the same number of lines, the same point of meeting, and the same angle between them, only a different direction, only a mirror-image. But unfortunately, relationships aren't exactly like math. That's why in math., when you have enough proves that X is greater than Y, it simply is, until some one else presents another theory. But in love, when everyone have proves that Y is greater than X, you can keep insisting that they're wrong, you can moreover claim they're simply looking at the wrong direction, and they can never see what you see, which is perfectly true, cause actually no one is looking at the mirror but you, no one can see the (>) a (<) but you. While you call yourself "enlightened with love" and make fun of them, you're just blinded with it!. And time between people realization of the right equation and yours, is never predictable, cause the time you'll take to turn around and see the real world out of the "mirror" lies only on you, and how far blinded you are.

"How could I love that person", "What a big nose he's got", "Y is greater than X" are the simple facts we could never see in the "mirror", are the simple facts separating the reality from the opposite of reality, the mirror-image of it. And in spite of this simple rule of mirrors, it's of a great pain to turn around. It's of a great pain to realize "the big nose he's got", not because it's that terrible, but because it always has been there!. The man's nose didn't grow up abroad, it has been there all the years. My ex's photo has been taken in 2004, and that's the source of shock. All the traits of the character of the other one have always been there. We just don't look at them, we don't want to see them, cause the "mirror" we're living in is much more beautiful, the "dream" is terrific, and we enjoy it the best, why to bother ourselves with reality?!. Another reason for the shock, we don't walk away of them cause they betrayed us, or cheated on us, or lied to us. All that would at least produce a reasonable anger, which could –to an extent- counteract the action of the shock. On the contrary, they were so honest and frank to us. So we were. That's why –for ex.- I could never answer the question of; "what have I done for you?", and that's why it always caused me a great pain, cause "you have done nothing", absolutely nothing, you're simply "you", you've been the same jerk all the time, but in the "dream", "you" that I saw and wanted to see is simply not "you"!. The "dream" which I believed in with my all heart and soul, turned out to be a big lie, a big shit, including "you" and "me"!. That's why I could not list the reasons for which I walked away, and I choose to walk away in silence some times, cause discussing the "dream/reality" theory on basis of (X/Y) relationship isn't always the best thing to be done with your ex!. Of course the degree of "blindness" depends on a lot of factors, but in an extreme form, the shock can be disasteristic.

I look at the photo, and I think; "What would happen if I saw it the same way since 2004?!. On the bright side, I wouldn't pass through the horrible experience. On the dark side, the history would never be the same!". Our experiences make our history. Our history isn't usually bright, but is usually ours. That's why I don't regret past relationships, cause I passed into them with my own feet. I chose to fall in love, I chose to live the dream, I chose to be blind, and I chose to wake up late!. Some of them are bad choices I've made, but they're mine, my history, which I don't regret, and can't give up.

4 comments:

Soha Bayoumi said...

I guess so :)
I guess the movie you refer to is Anna Karenina, based on the novel by Leo Tolstoy, which I definitely recommend. I don't know which version of the movie you saw, but I definitely recommend the 1937 one starring Greta Garbo and the 1948 one starring Vivian Leigh, that I prefer to the new one starring Sophie Marceau, which is not bad anyway either. Sorry for showing off my movie knowledge :p but Anna Karenina is one of the most intriguing fiction characters for me. The Egyptian version of the movie is "Nahr El-Hob" starring Faten Hamama and Omar Sharif. As for the "nose" thingy, it was actually his "ears": "Oh, mercy! why do his ears look like that?"... "But why is it his ears stick out so strangely? Or has he had his hair cut?" :))) I love this part...

There's another movie (an animation actually) based on a graphic novel where similar feelings are portrayed in part of it: it's Persepolis. Where the heroine is in love with some nice and good-looking guy, then after she realizes he's an asshole, he looks really ugly and stupid, and the nicest thing is that, since it's an animation and a graphic novel, we never know how he "really" looks like. I highly recommend this too!

I apologize if my comment is almost entirely off topic, but I have nothing to add on topic :)

Reham R. said...

يا شيخة نور الله عليكي كما نورتي علينا
حد ف الدنيا ميعرفش أنا كارنينا؟؟
دنا كنت مكسوفة كسفة وانا بكتب عن فيلم لا انا فاكرة أبطاله ولا اسمه ولا أي حاجة ف الدنيا غير جملة طلعت مش صح كمان :((، معلش بأة مناخير بينوكيو مأثرة عليا اليومين دول
متهيألي شفت واحدة من النسختين القدام، لأن دا كان زمان أوييي، وكان أبيض واسود، ومش فاكرة ان نهر الحب شبهه خالص، لأني مش فاكرة نهر الحب كويس أصلا! إهئ إهي ياللكسوف!
ولو عندك الفيلم الكرتون، ابقى فرجيهولنا ربنا يفرج ضيقتك :)))
برا الموضوع ايه بس؟ دنا كنت مستنية حد ينورني
بارك الله فيكي
وصباح الفل

دكتور مستكنيص said...

انتي بتقولي كلام زي الفل بس انا ليا تعقيب بسيط سوكنن
مهما كتبنا وحللنا في حوارات الحب والعواطف والحتة اللي في الشمال دي اللي جايبالنا الكافية فاحنا مش هنوصل لحاجة ملموسة نقول دي الصح ونمشي عليها يعني مراية الحب عامية اوكي تمام بس هل بكرة مثلا لو انتي حبيتي وفي وسط النشوة اللي انتي فيها هتقعدي تفوقي نفسك وتقولي لا مش هقع في الاخطاء الساذجة وهخلي مرايتي نظرها ستة علي ستة وتسيبي الهيام والاحاسيس الدافية كلها وتدوري علي عيوب حبيبك؟
أشك بصراحة
احنا هنفضل نحلل ونتكلم في الحب والمشاعر والليلة دي كلها من غير مانوصل لحاجة وحتي لو وصلنا للحاجة دي فمش هنطبقها عملي
لاني شايف الحب زي الخدعة اللي بنقبل نحط نفسنا فيها واحنا عارفين انها خدعة علي امل اننا نكون الواحد في المية اللي بتطلع معاه جد ومش خدعة
تحياتي ليكي وعلي فكرة رايك شدني اوي عند طارق امام وده اللي جابني هنا وياريت تتاح فرصة نتناقش في الراي ده لان فعلا الجزئية دي محيراني اوي

Reham R. said...

دكتور مستكنيص:
تمام. والغرض من كتابتي التدوينة دي هو الإشارة لغياب الشيء المحسوس المادي ده، كل اللي كنت بحاول أقوله اننا في الحب بنشوف الحاجات غلط، وفي أقصى النشوة، بنشوفها مقلوبة، كأنها في مراية بالزبط.
ده طبعا بيتم بنسب معينة، وموجود في كل الحالات زي ما قلت، انما نقدر نوفق بين القلب والعقل، نقدر نفكر ونناقش مشاعرنا دي، مش عيب، نقدر نعرف من غير مجهود كبير ان قدر كبير من الحاجات المشتركة لازم يكون موجود بين أي اتنين في أي علاقة، الحاجات المتضمنة أفكار ومعتقدات وإيمانات ومفضلات معينة وأشياء خاصة وإلخ، وان المشاعر لوحدها كدا مش كفاية، دي فكرة طفولية شوية. الفكرة مش اني هقعد أعد لحبيبي عيوبه، الفكرة اني هحاول أواجه نفسي بوجودها -إلى جانب ميزاته- وأسأل نفسي بصراحة ان كنت أقدر أعيش ف وجودها ولا لأ، بس كدا، اللحظة اللي بكتشف فيها انه صعب أوي أعيش ف وجودها، هي اللحظة اللي مفروض كل حاجة تنتهي فيها، لكن كمان خبراتنا بتضيفلنا كتير، يعني أكيد أول تجربة ليك مش زي التجربة العاشرة، أكيد في أخطاء بنعملها بنتفاداها تاني مرة، وكل مرة ب"نفشل" بنكتشف طريقة جديدة ل"عدم إنجاح العلاقة"، زي أديسون والألف طريقة لعدم إضاءة المصباح. لكن مش هنبطل نحاول، وأكيد في مرة هنكتشف طريقة للنجاح، "أكيد" مش "احتمال".. دا رأيي :))

انما أنا بقرف طارق إمام في تدوينات كتيرة أوي، تقصد أنهي حوار منهم؟ بتاع القارئ؟ ياريت طبعا نتناقش، ممكن نتناقش هناك، وممكن هنا، اللي يريحك :)